Illustrating Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Environmental Fate Models Using Partitioning Maps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variations of model predictions of the environmental fate of organic contaminants are usually analyzed for only one or at most a few selected chemicals, even though parameter sensitivity and contribution to uncertainty are widely different for different chemicals. A graphical method is introduced that allows for the comprehensive investigation of model sensitivity and uncertainty for all persistent organic nonelectrolytes at the same time. This is achieved by defining a two-dimensional hypothetical "chemical space" as a function of the equilibrium partition coefficients between air, water, and octanol (KOW, KAW, KOA), and plotting sensitivity and/or uncertainty of a specific model result to each input parameter as a function of this chemical space. The approach is illustrated for the bulk phase concentrations in air, water, soil, and sediment calculated by a level III model. Colored contour maps facilitate the identification of those input parameters that cause a high output variation of hypothetical and real chemicals. They also allow for the easy categorization of chemicals in terms of common parameter sensitivities, and thus comparable environmental behavior. Sensitivity varies with the mode of emission and the degradability of the chemicals, making it necessary to develop multiple sets of contour maps. Comparison of these sets of maps in turn allows the investigation of how parameter sensitivities change as a result of changes in mode of emission and persistence. The presented method can be used for investigating the sensitivity of any prediction obtained with any linear fate model that characterizes the partitioning behavior of organic chemicals with KAW, KoW, and KOA. Once the sensitivity maps have been constructed for a given environmental scenario, it is possible to perform a sensitivity analysis for a specific chemical by simple. placement of the substances' partitioning combinations within the chemical space. The maps can further contribute to the mechanistic understanding of a model's behavior, can aid in explaining observations of divergent environmental behavior of related substances, and can provide a rationale for grouping chemicals with similar model behavior, or for selecting representative example chemicals for a model investigation. They can also help in deciding when accurate and precise knowledge of physical chemical property data is crucial and when approximate numbers suffice to conduct a model investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".