Inner-sphere two-electron reduction leads to cleavage and functionalization of coordinated dinitrogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activation of molecular nitrogen by transition metal complexes is an area of current interest as investigations using the inert N2 molecule to produce higher-value organonitrogen compounds intensify. In an attempt to extend the addition of hydride reagents E-H (where E = BR2, AlR2, and SiR3) to the dinitrogen complex ([NPN]Ta)2(mu-H)2(mu-eta1:eta2-N2) [1; where NPN = (PhNSiMe2CH2)2PPh], the reaction with zirconocene chlorohydride, [Cp2Zr(Cl)H]x, was examined. The crystalline product formed in 35% yield was determined to be ([NP(N)N]Ta)(mu-H)2(mu-N)(Ta[NPN])(ZrCp2) (2) in which the coordinated N2 has been cleaved to form a phosphinimide bridging between Ta and Zr and a triply bridging nitride. The mechanism of this reaction was examined to determine the fate of the chloride and hydride ligands attached to Zr in the starting zirconocene reagent. Using the zirconocene dihydride dimer ([Cp2ZrH2]2), a higher yield of 2 was obtained (76%), and H2 was also observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. To probe the origin of the eliminated H2, the dideuterated dinitrogen complex ([NPN]Ta)2(mu-D)2(mu-eta1:eta2-N2) (d2-1) was allowed to react with ([Cp2ZrH2]2), which resulted in the formation of ([NP(N)N]Ta)(mu-D)2(mu-N)(Ta[NPN])(ZrCp2), (d2-2), with no evidence of hydrogen for deuterium scrambling between the starting zirconocene dihydride and the ditantalum dinitrogen complex. Studies into the use of preformed Zr(II) and Ti(II) reagents were also performed. The proposed mechanism involves initial adduct formation that facilitates inner-sphere electron transfer to cleave the N-N bond to form a species with bridging nitrides, one of which is transformed by nucleophilic attack of a phosphine donor to generate the observed phosphinimide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".