Phenotypic and Molecular Diversity of <i>Cochliobolus sativus</i> Populations from Wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spot blotch, caused by Cochliobolus sativus, is a devastating foliar disease of wheat in Nepal and in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. However, limited information on variation in virulence and genetic structure of C. sativus from wheat is available. In this study, pathogenic variation of 96 isolates of C. sativus from the Hill and Plain areas in Nepal (n = 48) and in the Central and Northern areas in North Dakota (n = 48) were evaluated on 12 differential wheat lines. DNA polymorphisms in all isolates were analyzed using eight selected amplified fragment length polymorphism primer combinations. Phenotypic data analysis showed the isolates varied greatly and were classified into 47 pathotypes. Cluster analysis indicated the isolates fell into three distinct groups with low, intermediate, and high virulence. Population genetic analysis revealed significant linkage disequilibrium ([Formula: see text] = 0.066 to 0.292), indicating that sexual reproduction plays little or no role in evolution and disease epidemiology in wheat fields. Furthermore, the corrected standardized fixation index (G″ ST = 0.05 and 0.02) showed no evidence of genetic differentiation in C. sativus populations. Collectively, these results confirmed high pathogenic and molecular diversity in the C. sativus populations collected from wheat foliar infections and will be useful to assist in developing resistant cultivars to manage this disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".