MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1967057587 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0401

John A: The Man Who Made Us: The Life and Times of John A. Macdonald. Vol. 1: 1815–1867 (review)

2009· article· en· W1967057587 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jacques Monet

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominionBiographyHistoryPoliticsClassicsArt historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: John A: The Man Who Made Us: The Life and Times of John A. Macdonald. Vol. 1: 1815–1867 Jacques Monet (bio) Richard Gwyn. John A: The Man Who Made Us: The Life and Times of John A. Macdonald. Vol. 1: 1815–1867. Random House Canada. viii, 501. $37.00 With this book Richard Gwyn has surpassed himself. Well known as a political commentator for the Toronto Star and the author of at least six books, including biographies of Joey Smallwood and Pierre Trudeau, he now brings us the first half of a biography of ‘the man who made us,’ John Macdonald, one of the principal ‘Fathers’ of Confederation and the first prime minister (for twenty years) of the new dominion. It has all the distinction and quality Gwyn has led us to expect from his previous writings: articles, books, columns, and all. I think it is his best work. It is certainly the John A. whom scholars and students, whom all Canadians (will there soon be a French translation?) will want to get to know. It is a wonderful read, flowing informally and informatively as it gives new life and vitality to the story of the charming rascal – Sir Hector Langevin called him ‘un fin renard’ – who more than any other single person ensured the success (ongoing now for 144 years) of the foundational agreements over what has become Canada’s ‘New Nationality.’ Gwyn credits Donald Creighton’s fifty-year-old definitive and monumental work on Macdonald for providing him with stimulation and challenge. True: to readers of my age nothing can replace the Creighton achievement, or the Laurentian thesis, or again a Macdonald as super-hero (though my own view is that until 1873 Cartier is the real hero). Gwyn’s Macdonald is a real human being, afflicted with a terribly sad, dysfunctional family life but endearingly blessed with powerful gifts both for remarkable political insight and for deeply loyal friendships. Creighton’s Macdonald is awesome. Gwyn’s is admirable and attractive. [End Page 315] We should all be grateful to him that he not only rose to the Creighton challenge but especially that he has made us all want to read more and more about Sir John A. John A. is a magnificent portrait, truer, I think, to the real Macdonald than anything else I have ever seen or read. The book is also about Sir John’s times, that is, about the issues, people, and places within them: the mindsets and political habits of mid-Victorian Canadians; the rebellions, responsible government, and the peripatetic capital; Maritime differences and the Grand Trunk railway; the ‘double majority’ and the ‘double shuffle’; the clergy reserves, the Rideau Canal, the Orange Order, and the spread of ultramontanism; the Victoria Bridge and Maritime Union; the non-minuted debates of the Quebec Conference; business imperatives, sectarian riots, separate schools, and the two nations making peace in the bosom of a single state; they are all there, often in a new and original light, still, highly relevant, always clearly presented as an explanation for our own day. Gwyn’s story is compelling. Also, the footnotes, the note on sources, and the bibliography make it an essential reference book for scholars, and no doubt for decades to come. I am eagerly looking forward to volume 2. ps. The Gordon Fulton photograph on the front cover shows an unusually handsome and smiling man. Why is he not on our ten-dollar bills? Jacques Monet Jacques Monet, S.J., Canadian Institute of Jesuit Studies Copyright © 2009 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→