MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967080607 · doi:10.1130/b30843.1

A pericratonic model for the Pearya terrane as an extension of the Franklinian margin of Laurentia, Canadian Arctic

2013· article· en· W1967080607 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thomas Hadlari, W J Davis, Keith Dewing

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersUniversity of Arizona
KeywordsLaurentiaTerraneIconCitationArcticExtension (predicate logic)Margin (machine learning)GeologyHistoryLibrary scienceArt historyArchaeologyPaleontologyOceanographyComputer sciencePaleozoic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| January 01, 2014 A pericratonic model for the Pearya terrane as an extension of the Franklinian margin of Laurentia, Canadian Arctic T. Hadlari; T. Hadlari † 1Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 33rd Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7, Canada †E-mails: thomas.hadlari@nrcan.gc.ca; bill.davis@nrcan.gc.ca; keith.dewing@nrcan.gc.ca. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar W.J. Davis; W.J. Davis † 2Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada †E-mails: thomas.hadlari@nrcan.gc.ca; bill.davis@nrcan.gc.ca; keith.dewing@nrcan.gc.ca. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar K. Dewing K. Dewing † 1Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 33rd Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7, Canada †E-mails: thomas.hadlari@nrcan.gc.ca; bill.davis@nrcan.gc.ca; keith.dewing@nrcan.gc.ca. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GSA Bulletin (2014) 126 (1-2): 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1130/B30843.1 Article history received: 19 Dec 2012 rev-recd: 17 Jul 2013 accepted: 17 Aug 2013 first online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation T. Hadlari, W.J. Davis, K. Dewing; A pericratonic model for the Pearya terrane as an extension of the Franklinian margin of Laurentia, Canadian Arctic. GSA Bulletin 2014;; 126 (1-2): 182–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B30843.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract New detrital zircon sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) geochronology and published framework geology of Neoproterozoic to Silurian strata are integrated to reexamine tectonic models of the Pearya terrane and the Franklinian margin at Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. Compared to Cambrian detrital zircon reference spectra, Neoproterozoic sandstones from the Pearya terrane contain Laurentian detrital zircon ages. In fact, they compare very well with Neoproterozoic strata of Greenland. Ultramafic, tholeiitic, and andesitic basalts of the Maskell Inlet complex, inferred to have an age of ca. 481 Ma, predate the M'Clintock orogeny at ca. 475 Ma. Ordovician granitoid ages within the Pearya terrane span ca. 475–463 Ma. A K-Ar cooling age of 452 Ma records post-tectonic exhumation. Deposited at ca. 450 Ma, new data show that the Cape Discovery Formation contains mainly ca. 500–450 Ma detrital zircon ages, but also older ages of 660–620 Ma. Upper Ordovician sandstones indicate that the Pearya terrane platform continued to receive near-syndepositional zircon. The Pearya terrane platform was submerged at ca. 435 Ma and overlain by Silurian flysch fed by sources similar to detrital zircon within Proterozoic to Ordovician strata of the Pearya terrane. Ties between the Pearya terrane and the Franklinian shelf include: similar Proterozoic-Cambrian stratigraphy; detrital zircon ages from the Lower Cambrian Grantland Formation that appear to be a combination of recycled Marinoan strata of Pearya terrane and Franklinian shelf strata; and profound unconformities on the Franklinian shelf that correlate temporally to the M'Clintock orogeny.A pericratonic model is a straightforward solution to the tectonic history of the Pearya terrane and the Franklinian shelf. We hypothesize that the Pearya terrane was part of the Franklinian margin in the Neoproterozoic and that the intervening deep water basin, or Hazen Trough, originated as a failed rift. The Maskell Inlet complex records ca. 481 Ma volcanism as a response to mantle upwelling beneath a subducting slab, shortly before or as the continent-ocean transition zone of the Franklinian margin was over-ridden. Continued convergence and crustal thickening during arc-continent collision drove the M'Clintock orogeny at ca. 475 Ma and resulted in the unconformities on the Franklinian shelf. After arc-continent collision, magmatism between ca. 475 and 438 Ma was related to subduction on the outboard margin, and the Pearya terrane was overlain by a low-accommodation retroarc foreland basin. A subsequent collisional event led to progressive drowning of the Pearya terrane and Franklinian platforms between 435 and 425 Ma. Silurian flysch then blanketed the Pearya terrane and entered the axis of the foreland basin, which also received sediment from cratonic sources of the flexural basin margin. Limited deformation at northern Axel Heiberg Island was associated with a ca. 390 Ma granitoid within the Pearya terrane. After a Devonian pulse of subsidence, infilling of the basin to form the Devonian clastic wedge overlapped in age with small ca. 368 Ma granitic intrusions within the Pearya terrane and was followed by extensive foreland deformation of the Late Devonian–Mississippian Ellesmerian orogeny. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207