Models of non-Boussinesq lock-exchange flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nearly all analytical models of lock-exchange flow are based on the shallow-water approximation. Since the latter approximation fails at the leading edges of the mutually intruding fluids of lock-exchange flow, solutions to the shallow-water equations can be obtained only through the specification of front conditions. In the present paper, analytic solutions to the shallow-water equations for non-Boussinesq lock-exchange flow are given for front conditions deriving from free-boundary arguments. Analytic solutions are also derived for other proposed front conditions – conditions which appear to the shallow-water system as forced boundary conditions. Both solutions to the shallow-water equations are compared with the numerical solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations and a mixture of successes and failures is recorded. The apparent success of some aspects of the forced solutions of the shallow-water equations, together with the fact that in a real fluid the density interface is a free boundary, shows the need for an improved theory of lock-exchange flow taking into account non-hydrostatic effects for density interfaces intersecting rigid boundaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".