Investigating the Molecular Determinants for Substrate Channeling in BphI–BphJ, an Aldolase–Dehydrogenase Complex from the Polychlorinated Biphenyls Degradation Pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BphI-BphJ, an aldolase-dehydrogenase complex from the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) degradation pathway, cleaves 4-hydroxy-2-oxoacids to pyruvate and an aldehyde. The enzyme complex was shown to exhibit substrate channeling, whereby linear aldehydes of up to 6 carbons long and branched isobutyraldehyde were directly channeled from the aldolase to the dehydrogenase with greater than 80% efficiency. BphI variants G322F, G322L, and G323F were created and were found to block aldehyde channeling. The dehydrogenase cofactor NADH was able to activate the catalytic activity of the aldol cleavage reaction in these variants, suggesting that activation of BphI by BphJ cofactors is not solely due to faster aldehyde release. A G323L variant was able to channel acetaldehyde but not the larger propionaldehyde while the G323A variant was able to channel butyraldehyde but not its isomer isobutyraldehyde, confirming that the restricted channeling of aldehydes in these glycine variants are due to steric blockage of the channel. Substitution of His-20 and Tyr-290 in BphI led to significant reductions in aldehyde channeling efficiencies. A mechanism of substrate channeling involving these two gating residues is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".