Development of a gene‐trap vector with a highly sensitive fluorescent protein reporter system for expression profiling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Combining high-content screening (HCS) with random gene-trap mutagenesis could be a powerful tool to investigate transcriptional networks, cell signaling, chemical genetics, and developmental processes. However, a critical limitation has been poor quantification of reporter expression per cell. To overcome this hurdle, we generated a variety of Gtx-based expression cassettes and re-evaluated translational enhancement of arrayed Gtx segments in tandem by HCS. We then modified the cassette into a new polyA trap vector, which consists of a variant of yellow fluorescent protein, Venus, in combination with the Gtx segments. Expression of Venus was detected in about 60% of trapped genes assayed in embryonic stem cell (ESC) cultures, comparable to expression screening of LacZ-based vectors. Furthermore, tetraploid aggregations using a clone encoding a gene-trap insertion into Twist2 demonstrated identical spatiotemporal expression between Venus and Twist2. This highly sensitive reporter system is amenable to high-throughput expression-based real-time HCS including single cell analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it