Permanent consequences in Langerhans cell histiocytosis patients: A pilot study from the Histiocyte Society—Late Effects Study Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Permanent consequences (PC) are often described among subjects with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) but data on the real incidence are scarce. Within the Histiocyte Society (HS), and in order to design a definitive late effects study, a retrospective survey was organized to describe the prevalence of PC among long-term survivors of LCH. METHODS: Nine institutions contributed with their LCH patients having a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Information was collected on their disease-history, and on type and date of onset of any PC. Because of the retrospective type of this study, it was accepted that each institution might have used different criteria to assess PC. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two subjects were registered and in 95 (52%) at least 1 PC was reported. For some specific PC (e.g., anterior pituitary dysfunction) information was too scarce to provide reliable data. PC were more frequent among subjects with multisystem (MS) disease (71%), compared to those with single system (SS) disease (24%); P < 0.0001. The most frequently reported PC were diabetes insipidus (DI) (24%) orthopedic abnormalities (20%), hearing loss (13%), and neurological consequences (11.0%). Analysis of cumulative risk showed that some types of PC may become manifest more than 10 years from diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This survey on selected cases of LCH survivors has confirmed that late sequels are frequent, and that they are even more common among those with MS LCH. Our findings highlight the need for long-term and patient-oriented follow-up in children with LCH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".