MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1967253281 · doi:10.1029/2008jd010341

Atmospheric circulation during active and break phases of Indian summer monsoon: A study using MST radar at Gadanki (13.5°N, 79.2°E)

2008· article· en· W1967253281 on OpenAlexaff
M. Roja Raman, V. V. M. Jagannadha Rao, M. Venkat Ratnam, G. Kishore Kumar, A. Narendra Babu, S. Vijaya Bhaskara Rao, N. Prabhakara Rao, T. Narayana Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHadley cellMonsoonZonal and meridionalAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyStratosphereTroposphereAtmospheric circulationEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric researchMonsoon of South AsiaWalker circulationGeneral Circulation ModelGeologyClimate changeEl Niño Southern Oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unique facility of measuring vertical winds using Indian mesosphere, stratosphere, and troposphere (MST) radar along with zonal and meridional winds enables the study of atmospheric circulation over Gadanki (13.5°N, 79.2°E) during the Indian summer monsoon season. The mean meridional circulations during winter and monsoon seasons represent part of two different Hadley circulations. The winter Hadley cell is observed to be stable whereas the monsoon Hadley cell seems to vary and depends on the monsoon activity. During active phase of the monsoon, the Hadley cell extends to the north, and during weak phase, it extends to the south of the study region. The observed features are compared with the winds obtained from National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis data. The present study emphasizes that the atmospheric circulation during monsoon season is to be studied separately for active and break phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→