Medical Student Research Day award winning abstracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral Presentation Nicholas Petropolis; Supervisor: Dr. Benjamin Rusak, Department of Psychiatry Diurnal Variation in Levels of Brain Neurochemicals Poster Presentations Maria Currie; Supervisors: Dr. G.M. Hirsch, Dr. T.D.G. Lee, Department of Surgery Chris Jenkins; Supervisor: Dr. Bjorn Nashan, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University Characterization of T Regulatory Cells Generated by Oral Transplantation Tolerance The Summer Research Program provides opportunities for first and second year medical students to participate in research projects being conducted by members of the Faculty of Medicine. Each year, the recipients of these studentships present their work at the Medical Student Research Day. This is an opportunity for students to present their own research and to be engaged by the work of their peers. Thirty-one medical students presented research projects in the form of oral or poster presentations this year. For the first time, the DMJ is proud to publish the award winning abstracts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".