MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967301602 · doi:10.4141/p00-002

Effect of plant age on water content in crowns of fall rye and winter wheat cultivars differing in snow mold resistance

2001· article· en· W1967301602 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
D. A. Gaudet, André Laroche, B. Puchalski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurfgrass Adaptation and Management
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsCultivarHorticultureHardening (computing)Winter wheatBiologySnowAnimal scienceDry weightAgronomyChemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resistance to snow molds in winter wheat increases with plant age, and older plants express higher levels of resistance than young plants. Experiments were conducted to study the effect of plant age on percent crown water content (%CWC) and dry weights in fall rye and winter wheat cultivars grown under controlled environments and in the field at Lethbridge, AB. Under controlled environments, the oldest (6 wk of pre-hardening growth at 20°C) treatments accumulated the greatest dry weights following exposure of plants to 1 to 6 wk hardening conditions at 2°C, compared with younger (1 to 4 wk pre-hardening growth) treatments. Exposure of plants to hardening temperatures had the greatest effect on %CWC values, which decreased, gradually, from 82–89% (4.95–8.67 g H2O g–1 DW) in unhardened treatments to 67–72% (2.05–2.65 g H2O g–1 DW) in plants receiving the 6 wk pre-hardening and 6 wk hardening growth. However, the oldest treatments (4 to 6 wk pre-hardening growth) always exhibited the lowest %CWC values among all hardening treatments. The %CWC in the oldest (6 wk) unhardened plants was also lower ([Formula: see text] = 80.8% or 4.24 g H2O g–1 DW) than in the youngest (1wk) unhardened plants ([Formula: see text] = 91.2% or 11.31 g H2O g–1 DW ), demonstrating that water loss occurs in older plants in the absence of low hardening temperatures. In a field study at Lethbridge during the autumn, winter, and early spring of 1997–1998 and 1998–1999, different seeding dates were employed to obtain plants differing in age and developmental state. The %CWC in early-seeded treatments was lower during the autumn, and remained lower in early spring, compared with later seeded cultivars. The %CWC in crowns was negatively associated with the snow mold resistance rating of a fall rye and five winter wheat cultivars under controlled environment conditions, and among a fall rye and 13 winter wheat cultivars in the field; the highest correlation values in the field were observed from mid-November to mid-March during 1997–1998 (r = –0.84), and 1998–1999 (r = – 0.76). These results indicate that the type of snow mold resistance that increases with plant age is related to the accumulation of crown dry matter and the ability of wheat and rye plants to lose crown water in response to both extended growth at warm temperatures and hardening at low, above freezing temperatures. Key words: Carbohydrates, fructans, low temperature basidiomycete, Coprinus psychromorbidus

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicTurfgrass Adaptation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207