Pelas veredas da ironia: o homoerotismo em O pecado de João Agonia e O beijo no asfalto
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Sob a perspectiva comparatista, analisamos os diferentes caminhos tomados por Nelson Rodrigues, dramaturgo brasileiro, e Bernardo Santareno, teatrólogo português, na abordagem do homoerotismo em O beijo no asfalto e O pecado de João Agonia, respectivamente. Com interesse em detectar as diferentes configurações do tema e da linguagem discursiva, pretende-se verificar como a ironia, além de estar inserida já na ousadia em se abordar a temática, está presente em seus textos dramáticos. Mesmo trazendo este aspecto, ou justamente por trazê-lo, as configurações homoeróticas masculinas presentes nos textos dramáticos apontam para o contexto sociocultural, para os resquícios do preconceito que o homoerotismo carrega e que, ao mesmo tempo, faz com que os indivíduos o neguem. Palavras-chave : Bernardo Santareno. Nelson Rodrigues. Ironia. Homoerotismo. On the paths of irony: homoeroticism in O pecado de João Agonia and O beijo no asfalto Abstract: Under the comparative perspective, we aim to analyze the different paths taken by Nelson Rodrigues, Brazilian playwright, and Bernardo Santareno, Portuguese playwright, as to the approach of homoeroticism in O beijo no asfalto and O pecado de João Agonia, respectively. With the goal of dettecting different configurations of the theme and of the discursive language, we intend to check how the irony, in addition to being inserted already in the boldness in addressing the issue, is present in those dramatic texts. Even for bringing this aspect, or exactly for bringing it about, the configurations of male homoeroticism present in the dramatic texts point at the socio-cultural context, to the remnants of prejudice that homoeroticism loads and at the same time, makes individuals deny it. Key words: Bernardo Santareno. Nelson Rodrigues. Irony. Homoeroticism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it