MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967360045 · doi:10.1002/humu.10203

Characterization of 17 novel endoglin mutations associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

2003· article· en· W1967360045 on OpenAlexaff
Urszula Cymerman, Sonia Vera, Amna Karabegovic, S A Abdalla, Michelle Letarte

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Anomalies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExonBiologyGeneticsMolecular biologySplice site mutationMissense mutationTelangiectasesMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationMutationFrameshift mutationNonsense mutationExon skippingspliceMutantExon trappingGeneAlternative splicingTelangiectasiaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 1 (HHT1) is a vascular dysplasia caused by mutations in the endoglin (ENG) gene and associated with epistaxis, telangiectases, and a high incidence of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. To efficiently detect deletions and insertions, we optimized a quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (QMPCR) analysis. We report 17 novel mutations, of which six were detected by QMPCR. Three deletions occurring in intronic sequences were associated with a single copy of exons 9a-14, exon 5, and exons 7-8, respectively. A transient 70kDa monomeric mutant protein resulted from the in-frame deletion of exons 7 and 8 but no mutant protein was present in the other cases. Deletion (in exon 10) or insertion (in exon 7) of two nucleotides, as well as a 1-bp deletion in the small exon 9a were found by QMPCR. Sequencing was required to detect single nucleotide deletions/insertions in exons 2, 5, 6, and 8. No mutant proteins were associated with these frame shift mutations. Two novel splice site mutations resulted in skipping of exons 2 and 4, respectively, while a previously reported intron 3 splice mutant was observed as a de novo mutation. We also report five novel nonsense and missense mutations, including one de novo. Review of the 80 HHT1 families reported to date indicates that 10% would not be resolved by sequencing and that an additional 25% could be revealed by QMPCR performed prior to sequencing. Thus the use of QMPCR accelerates genetic screening for HHT1 and resolves mutations affecting whole exons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicVascular Anomalies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207