Glyburide Transport Across the Human Placenta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude of transplacental transfer of glyburide in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted on women with GDM on glyburide therapy. On delivery admission, the glyburide dose and time of last dose were recorded. Immediately postdelivery, maternal and umbilical venous blood samples were obtained and the concentrations of glyburide were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with a limit of detection of 0.25 ng/mL. RESULTS: Nineteen patient dyads were analyzed. The mean total daily maternal glyburide dose was 6.6±6.3 mg per day and the mean time between last dose and sampling was 13.3±6.5 hours. The mean maternal serum glyburide level at birth was 15.4±20.8 ng/mL, whereas the mean umbilical glyburide level was 7.5±8.2 ng/mL, which showed a statistical correlation (r=0.72, P<.01). There were statistically significant relationships between total maternal glyburide dose (1.25-20 mg per day) and maternal glyburide levels (0.93-70.71 ng/mL; r=0.46, P≤.01) and between total maternal glyburide dose and umbilical glyburide levels (0.95-32.41 ng/mL; r=0.43, P≤.01) However, we observed wide variability in maternal and umbilical glyburide levels at both extremes of the total glyburide dose. Seventy-nine percent of cord samples (15/19) had glyburide levels less than 10 ng/mL (the limit of detection reported in earlier studies) and 37% (7/19) were higher than the corresponding maternal samples. CONCLUSION: Transplacental transfer of glyburide is highly variable among patients, corroborating ex vivo placental perfusion studies showing a transport-mediated glyburide efflux from the fetal to the maternal circulation. In most neonates (79%), glyburide levels were below 10 ng/mL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".