Modifications to Increase the Efficiency of the Fluorometric Cycling Assay for Cyclic ADP-Ribose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) is an intracellular messenger that triggers the release of calcium ions from intracellular stores in a variety of cell types. The fluorometric cycling assay has become the preferred method for measuring cADPR due to its high level of sensitivity (in the sub-nanomolar range) and its use of commercially available reagents. Additionally, the assay is performed in multiwell plates, making it suitable for high throughput screening using a fluorescence plate reader. The findings reported in this paper present several problems that may be encountered during various stages of the assay, and provide solutions to these problems. Modifications to the assay address reduced recovery of sample and cADPR with removal of perchloric acid (PCA) using organic solvent, reduction in diaphorase activity with heat treatment, and effects on resorufin fluorescence by pH range. Using these modifications, we report an increase of approximately 15% in recovery of brain cADPR, and show that between-subject variability is greatly reduced. We hope that these observations will encourage more widespread application of this valuable assay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".