MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967406574 · doi:10.2310/7750.2013.13036

Incontinentia Pigmenti in an XY Boy: Case Report and Review of the Literature

2014· review· en· W1967406574 on OpenAlexaff
Erin Mullan, Mher Barbarian, Yannis Trakadis, Brenda Moroz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and rare skin diseases.
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncontinentia pigmentiMedicineSkin biopsyMutationGenodermatosisGenetic testingGenetic counselingHistopathologyGeneticsDermatologyBiopsyPathologyGeneBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Incontinentia pigmenti (IP) is a rare genetic skin disorder with X-linked dominant inheritance and a characteristic sequence of cutaneous manifestations, which is regarded as lethal in XY males. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a surviving XY male with the common IKBKG (NEMO) gene deletion confirming IP. METHODS AND RESULTS: A newborn XY male with suspected IP underwent a skin biopsy on affected tissue for histopathology. Molecular genetic testing was also performed on the specimen and revealed the common IKBKG gene deletion with a pattern suggestive of somatic mosaicism. Our findings are aligned with a PubMed literature review for XY males with IP and documented IKBKG mutation. We determined that only 10 such genetically proven cases have been reported, including our case. CONCLUSION: Although relatively rare, cases of IP in XY males with the common NEMO mutation have likely been underreported due to the unavailability of appropriate testing in the past. Karyotype and molecular testing should be considered when clinical suspicion of IP arises for a male patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicGenetic and rare skin diseases.French-language works237,207