Maternal serum adiponectin and infant birthweight: the role of adiponectin isoform distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adiponectin is an insulin-sensitizing protein that circulates in oligomeric complexes, including trimers, hexamers and high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers. In pregnant women, conflicting associations have been reported between maternal serum levels of total adiponectin (i.e. reflecting all isoforms) and infant birthweight. As the HMW complex has recently been proposed as the primary mediator of metabolic bioactivity, we hypothesized that differences in isoform distribution may underlie these conflicting reports. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between maternal adiponectin isoforms and infant birthweight. DESIGN/PATIENTS/MEASUREMENTS: HMW and total adiponectin, as well as the ratio of HMW to total adiponectin (ratio known as S(A)), were measured in healthy pregnant Caucasian women (n = 58) undergoing an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), following an abnormal glucose challenge test. RESULTS: On univariate analysis adjusted for neonate gender and length of gestation, birthweight was positively correlated with weight gain in pregnancy (r = 0.29, P = 0.031) and inversely associated with the IS(OGTT) index of insulin sensitivity (r = -0.27, P = 0.041), total adiponectin (r = -0.31, P = 0.021), HMW adiponectin (r = -0.34, P = 0.0093) and S(A) (r = -0.34, P = 0.011). On multiple linear regression analyses, however, total adiponectin was not related to birthweight. By contrast, HMW adiponectin was related at borderline significance (t = -1.87, P = 0.068), while S(A) emerged as an independent negative determinant of infant birthweight (t = -2.46, P = 0.0175). Adjusted mean neonatal birthweight was significantly higher in the infants of women comprising the lowest tertile of S(A) compared to women in the highest tertile of S(A) (3684 vs. 3424 g, P = 0.0375). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of maternal serum adiponectin in HMW form (S(A)) is independently and inversely associated with infant birthweight. Thus, adiponectin isoform distribution, rather than total adiponectin concentration, may be a correlate of foetal size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".