Cognitive Development in School-Age Children With Vertically Transmitted HIV Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined a broad range of neuropsychological functioning in school-age children with vertically transmitted HIV infection and a control group made up of siblings of children with HIV infection. Fourteen children with HIV (2 asymptomatic, 8 mildly symptomatic, and 4 with AIDS) and 11 control children were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing intelligence, receptive language, expressive language, visual and verbal memory, visual-motor speed and coordination, visual-motor and visual-spatial processing, fine motor skill, and academic achievement. Results revealed that school-age children with vertically transmitted HIV infection show many areas of cognitive function within the normal range. Despite normal cognitive development, subtle motor impairments were documented in children with vertically transmitted HIV infection. Our results are the first report of fine motor and motor strength deficits in school-age children with vertically transmitted HIV. Lastly, computed tomography (CT) results suggest that children with HIV who have documented structural anomalies in the brain may be at risk for deficits in visual-motor and visual-spatial processing. This finding should be explored with larger samples and other measures to determine its generalizability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".