Cognitive Development in School-Age Children With Vertically Transmitted HIV Infection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined a broad range of neuropsychological functioning in school-age children with vertically transmitted HIV infection and a control group made up of siblings of children with HIV infection. Fourteen children with HIV (2 asymptomatic, 8 mildly symptomatic, and 4 with AIDS) and 11 control children were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing intelligence, receptive language, expressive language, visual and verbal memory, visual-motor speed and coordination, visual-motor and visual-spatial processing, fine motor skill, and academic achievement. Results revealed that school-age children with vertically transmitted HIV infection show many areas of cognitive function within the normal range. Despite normal cognitive development, subtle motor impairments were documented in children with vertically transmitted HIV infection. Our results are the first report of fine motor and motor strength deficits in school-age children with vertically transmitted HIV. Lastly, computed tomography (CT) results suggest that children with HIV who have documented structural anomalies in the brain may be at risk for deficits in visual-motor and visual-spatial processing. This finding should be explored with larger samples and other measures to determine its generalizability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it