Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertyrosinemia encompasses several entities, of which tyrosinemia type I (or hepatorenal tyrosinemia, HT1) results in the most extensive clinical and pathological manifestations involving mainly the liver, kidney, and peripheral nerves. The clinical findings range from a severe hepatopathy of early infancy to chronic liver disease and rickets in the older child; gradual refinements in the diagnosis and medical management of this disorder have greatly altered its natural course, mirroring recent advances in the field of metabolic diseases in the past quarter century. Hepatorenal tyrosinemia is the inborn error with the highest incidence of progression to hepatocellular carcinoma, likely due to profound mutagenic effects and influences on the cell cycle by accumulated metabolites. The appropriate follow-up of patients with cirrhosis, the proper timing of liver transplantation in the prevention of carcinoma, and the long-term evolution of chronic renal disease remain important unresolved issues. The introduction of a new pharmacologic agent, NTBC, holds the hope of significantly alleviating some of the burdens of this disease. Mouse models of this disease have permitted the exploration of newer treatment modalities, such as gene therapy by viral vectors, including ex vivo and in utero methods. Finally, recent observations on spontaneous genetic reversion of the mutation in HT1 livers challenge conventional concepts in human genetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it