MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967607849 · doi:10.1007/s100240010146

Tyrosinemia: A Review

2001· review· en· W1967607849 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre A. Russo, Grant A. Mitchell, Robert M. Tanguay

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTyrosinemiaMedicineLiver transplantationCirrhosisLiver diseaseBioinformaticsDiseaseTransplantationHepatocellular carcinomaPathologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertyrosinemia encompasses several entities, of which tyrosinemia type I (or hepatorenal tyrosinemia, HT1) results in the most extensive clinical and pathological manifestations involving mainly the liver, kidney, and peripheral nerves. The clinical findings range from a severe hepatopathy of early infancy to chronic liver disease and rickets in the older child; gradual refinements in the diagnosis and medical management of this disorder have greatly altered its natural course, mirroring recent advances in the field of metabolic diseases in the past quarter century. Hepatorenal tyrosinemia is the inborn error with the highest incidence of progression to hepatocellular carcinoma, likely due to profound mutagenic effects and influences on the cell cycle by accumulated metabolites. The appropriate follow-up of patients with cirrhosis, the proper timing of liver transplantation in the prevention of carcinoma, and the long-term evolution of chronic renal disease remain important unresolved issues. The introduction of a new pharmacologic agent, NTBC, holds the hope of significantly alleviating some of the burdens of this disease. Mouse models of this disease have permitted the exploration of newer treatment modalities, such as gene therapy by viral vectors, including ex vivo and in utero methods. Finally, recent observations on spontaneous genetic reversion of the mutation in HT1 livers challenge conventional concepts in human genetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations223
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207