MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mutated-?-actin restores growth to a yeast amino acid transport defective mutant

2000· article· en· W1967611858 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Khamessan, Fakhraddin Naghibalhossaini, Masoud Vedadi, Rose M. Johnstone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Physiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplementary DNABiologyMolecular biologycDNA libraryOpen reading frameProlineMutantAmino acidBiochemistryPeptide sequenceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mutated yeast cell 22574d lacking all three proline transporters, PUT4, UGA4, and GAP1, and incapable of growth on proline recovers its lost ability to grow on proline as sole nitrogen source when transformed with a mutagenized mouse γ-actin cDNA (M-γ-A). Native mouse γ-actin cDNA is ineffective. The 3′-region of γ-actin cDNA was mutagenized to resemble E51 cDNA previously isolated from Ehrlich tumor cells. The E51 cDNA has an extended reading frame in the 3′-region compared to that in native γ-actin. The extension of the open reading frame in E51 cDNA, was found to be due to an additional pair of bases (TG) at position 1104 of E51 cDNA. After site-directed mutagenesis of the 3′-region of native γ-actin cDNA to resemble that of E51 cDNA, the construct, M-γ-A cDNA, was expressed in the 22574d yeast. While the transformation with M-γ-A increased the uptake of both proline and γ-amino butyric acid, the transport of five other solutes was not changed by this transformation. Northern blotting of the nontransformed and the M-γ-A-transformed 22574d cells with gene-specific probes for the three proline transporters showed the expression of an mRNA for UGA4 in both transformed and nontransformed cells but no evidence for the expression of GAP1 or PUT4. The mRNA for UGA4 was expressed at a lower level in strain 22574d than in the parent yeast Σ1278b. Furthermore, the message in the mutated cells is smaller in size by about 15%. These results are consistent with the synthesis of a mutated transporter which requires the coexpression of M-γ-A, but not native γ-actin, to restore physiological function, i.e., proline or γ-amino acid transport. J. Cell. Physiol. 186:124–135, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular PhysiologySame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207