Cervical spine injury in association with craniomaxillofacial fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
with vascularised fibular graft [VFG] (mean defect 14.6 cm).Mean period of follow-up was 44 months.Twenty-one (84%) and 16 (76%) patients in the IBT and VFG group, respectively achieved the radiological end points [p = 0.5].Bone and functional results, analyzed by Paley's evaluation system, showed no significant difference.Nineteen patients (76%) in IBT group and fifteen (71%) in the VFG group returned to productive work [p = 0.72].The hospital stay (15 days vs. 19 days) and operating time 2.45 h vs. 8.5 h) were significantly less of IBT group [p < 0.05].In IBT group external fixation index [EFI] (time in fixator/cm defect) was 1.21 [range 0.7-1.86].Mean hypertrophy time in VFG group of 18.5 m.Two patients in the IBT group and one in the VFG group had amputations and one patient in VFG group died.Three cases in the VFG group had flap loss.Stress fracture of the graft occurred in eight patients in the VFG group.Conclusion: Hospital stay, operating time and refractures were significantly less in IBT group while the incidence of re-operations were less in the VFG group.Choice of treatment should be decided by available expertise, informed patient choice and financial considerations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".