Perturbation of the Quinone-binding Site of Complex II Alters the Electronic Properties of the Proximal [3Fe-4S] Iron-Sulfur Cluster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (SQR) and menaquinol-fumarate oxidoreductase (QFR) from Escherichia coli are members of the complex II family of enzymes. SQR and QFR catalyze similar reactions with quinones; however, SQR preferentially reacts with higher potential ubiquinones, and QFR preferentially reacts with lower potential naphthoquinones. Both enzymes have a single functional quinone-binding site proximal to a [3Fe-4S] iron-sulfur cluster. A difference between SQR and QFR is that the redox potential of the [3Fe-4S] cluster in SQR is 140 mV higher than that found in QFR. This may reflect the character of the different quinones with which the two enzymes preferentially react. To investigate how the environment around the [3Fe-4S] cluster affects its redox properties and catalysis with quinones, a conserved amino acid proximal to the cluster was mutated in both enzymes. It was found that substitution of SdhB His-207 by threonine (as found in QFR) resulted in a 70-mV lowering of the redox potential of the cluster as measured by EPR. The converse substitution in QFR raised the redox potential of the cluster. X-ray structural analysis suggests that placing a charged residue near the [3Fe-4S] cluster is a primary reason for the alteration in redox potential with the hydrogen bonding environment having a lesser effect. Steady state enzyme kinetic characterization of the mutant enzymes shows that the redox properties of the [3Fe-4S] cluster have only a minor effect on catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".