Effect of 2MEGA Labeling on Membrane Proteome Analysis Using LC-ESI QTOF MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the challenges associated with large-scale proteome analysis using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and automated database searching is to reduce the number of false positive identifications without sacrificing the number of true positives found. In this work, a systematic investigation of the effect of 2MEGA labeling (N-terminal dimethylation after lysine guanidination) on the proteome analysis of a membrane fraction of an Escherichia coli cell extract by 2-dimensional liquid chromatography MS/MS is presented. By a large-scale comparison of MS/MS spectra of native peptides with those from the 2MEGA-labeled peptides, the labeled peptides were found to undergo facile fragmentation with enhanced a1 or a1-related (a(1)-17 and a(1)-45) ions derived from all N-terminal amino acids in the MS/MS spectra; these ions are usually difficult to detect in the MS/MS spectra of nonderivatized peptides. The 2MEGA labeling alleviated the biased detection of arginine-terminated peptides that is often observed in MALDI and ESI MS experiments. 2MEGA labeling was found not only to increase the number of peptides and proteins identified but also to generate enhanced a1 or a1-related ions as a constraint to reduce the number of false positive identifications. In total, 640 proteins were identified from the E. coli membrane fraction, with each protein identified based on peptide mass and sequence match of one or more peptides using MASCOT database search algorithm from the MS/MS spectra generated by a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Among them, the subcellular locations of 336 proteins are presently known, including 258 membrane and membrane-associated proteins (76.8%). Among the classified proteins, there was a dramatic increase in the total number of integral membrane proteins identified in the 2MEGA-labeled sample (153 proteins) versus the unlabeled sample (77 proteins).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".