Swelling pressures of compacted bentonites from diffuse double layer theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The swelling pressures of several compacted bentonites (MX80, Febex, and Montigel) proposed for use as barrier materials in storing high-level radioactive waste in many countries were determined from the GouyChapman diffuse double layer theory. The swelling pressures thus determined were compared with the reported experimental swelling pressures. The study revealed that, in general, at low compaction dry densities of the bentonites, the experimental swelling pressures are less than their theoretical counterparts, with the reverse trend at high compaction dry densities. Based on the reported experimental results for the three bentonites, relationships between the nondimensional midplane potential function, u, and the nondimensional distance function, Kd, were established. New equations for the swelling pressure were proposed on the basis of the diffuse double layer theory and the reported experimental data to compute swelling pressures of compacted bentonites. The suitability of the new equations was also verified with additionally reported experimental swelling pressures from three other bentonites (Kunigel V1, Kunigel, and bentonite S-2) that have been also proposed for use as barrier materials. Very good agreement was found in all the cases between the experimental swelling pressures and the swelling pressures obtained using the proposed equations. The use of the proposed equations is based on the weighted average valency of the cations present in bentonites, since the valency of the cations present has a significant influence on the swelling pressure.Key words: clays, compressibility, swelling pressure, expansive soils, chemical properties, radioactive waste disposal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it