MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967694111 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2014.2337717

A Novel Energy-Efficient Transmission Scheme in CO-OFDM Elastic Optical Networks

2014· article· en· W1967694111 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Wang, Pin-Han Ho, Chih‐Hao Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingTransmission (telecommunications)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringFrequency-division multiplexingBit error rateMultiplexingWavelength-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)WavelengthOpticsTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) technology enables an optical transmission system to break the limitation of wavelength grids due to legacy of wavelength division multiplexing. This constructs a flexible and elastic transmission paradigm so as to achieve high spectrum efficiency and flexibility of fiber resource usage. This paper introduces a novel adaptive transmission strategy in elastic coherent optical OFDM transmission systems, aiming to optimize the system operation in terms of energy and spectrum consumptions for a transmission demand with a required data rate. By jointly considering the nonlinear effects of Mach-Zehnder modulator and amplified spontaneous emission noise from optical amplifiers, as well as the performance impairment due to high peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR) in the electronic domain, we first provide an analytical model on the bit error rate performance for a single-elastic optical transmission line. To achieve an efficient PAPR reduction, we introduce a new method called simplified null switching, which is considered very suitable in the elastic optical transmission systems due to lower computation complexity and little dependence on the channel side information. Based on the analytical model, an optimization problem is formulated based on the proposed analytical model and solved via mathematical programming. Case studies via extensive numerical experiments are conducted to verify the proposed analytical model and gain better understanding on the solutions of formulated optimization problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207