The Effect of Increased Stiffness of the Incudostapedial Joint on the Transmission of Air-Conducted Sound by the Human Middle Ear
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the possible effects of increased stiffness at the incudostapedial joint (ISJ) on sound transmission in the human middle ear. BACKGROUND: The physiologic role played by the IS joint in the mechanics of human middle ear function is unclear. It is also unclear how fixation of this joint might manifest itself and what the implications are of fixing this joint during surgical reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Increased stiffness of the ISJ will affect sound transmission through the middle ear. METHODS: Cyanoacrylate adhesive was instilled around the ISJ joint in 5 fresh human cadaveric temporal bones to increase ISJ stiffness. Laser Doppler vibrometry measurements of sound-induced peak-to-peak displacement of the umbo and stapes footplate were made before and after stiffening the ISJ. RESULTS: At baseline, the measurements at the stapes footplate followed those at the umbo but were approximately 12 dB lower in the speech frequencies. We found that stiffening the ISJ produced an almost equal decrease in peak-to-peak displacement at both the umbo and the stapes footplate, with little change in their relative motion, consistent with an increase in ossicular impedance. The decrease was mainly between 400 and 1,000 Hz with a statistically significant mean magnitude loss of 6 dB at 740 Hz. CONCLUSION: Increased stiffness at the ISJ results in a small, probably clinically insignificant decrease of 3 to 6 dB in middle ear sound transmission in the lower frequencies between 400 and 1,000 Hz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".