Proton Release Due to Manganese Binding and Oxidation in Modified Bacterial Reaction Centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pH dependence of binding and oxidation of Mn2+ in highly oxidizing reaction centers with designed metal-binding sites was characterized by light-minus-dark optical difference spectroscopy and direct measurements of proton uptake/release. These mutants bind a Mn2+ ion that can efficiently transfer an electron to the oxidized bacteriochlorophyll dimer, as described earlier [Thielges et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 7389-7394]. The dissociation constant, KD, significantly increased with decreasing pH. The pH dependence of KD between pH 7 and pH 8 was consistent with the binding of Mn2+ being stabilized by the electrostatic release of two protons. The strong pH dependence of proton release upon Mn2+ binding, with a maximal release of 1.4 H+ per reaction center, was interpreted as being a result of a shift in the pKa values of the coordinating residues and possibly other nearby residues. A small amount of proton release associated with Mn2+ oxidation was observed upon illumination. These results show that functional metal-binding sites can be incorporated into proteins upon consideration of both the metal coordination and protonation states of the ligands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".