MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A pleistocene frost-heaved dome in palaeozoic limestone at Kingston, Ontario, Canada

2000· article· en· W1967765321 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Robert G. Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenuePermafrost and Periglacial Processes · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
KeywordsGeologyDome (geology)ArchaeologyPaleozoicGeomorphologySoulBedrockGeologistPaleontologyHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dome in Palaeozoic limestone at Kingston is 7.5 m in diameter as revealed in a roadcut and about 11 m at its maximum as indicated by ground-penetrating radar. The centre has been displaced 1.5 m upward in the exposure and up to 2.5 m internally in a circular arch. The dome appears to be roughly circular in plan and up-arching of the limestone extends to about 17 m depth. The dome has been eroded to a nearly plane surface by glaciation as indicated by striations on limestone blocks at the surface. Based on similarity of form to features in modern periglacial environments, the dome is proposed to have originated by frost heaving of bedrock before the late Wisconsinan glaciation of southern Ontario. This is the first report of such a feature, and recognition of their occurrence in formerly periglacial regimes should provide a useful tool in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePermafrost and Periglacial ProcessesSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207