MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967773090 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e318186cd1b

Transoral Endoscopically Assisted Closure of Cleft Palate in Foals

2008· article· en· W1967773090 on OpenAlexaff
Heico-Rüdiger Krause, Marc Koene, Jan Rustemeyer

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCleft Lip and Palate Research
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFoalSurgeryAspiration pneumoniaSoft palateNosePalatal obturatorPneumoniaProsthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir: The repair of cleft palate in foals has been compared with that in humans regarding importance. Because of the anatomical differences in the oropharynx and hypopharynx between horses and humans, clefting in equines results not only in an insufficient absorption of nutrients by nasal milk escape but also, following aspiration, in a life-threatening aspiration pneumonia. Current reports suggest that cleft palate repair in foals is technically difficult and is accompanied by a high complication rate. Despite successful cleft repair, aspiration pneumonia existing before the operation can be fatal.1 The distance between a foal’s front teeth and palate is too large for a transoral approach such as that performed in humans. Until now, therefore, an extraoral access was applied by means of a symphysiotomy of the mandible, often in combination with a pharyngotomy. Thus, the vast soft-tissue wound led predominantly to uncontrollable infections and asphyxia.2–4 To avoid these complications, we decided to take a transoral approach using endoscopic instruments and technologies to bridge the distance. In a 5-week-old stallion, milk outflow off the nose during sucking was observed from birth. Increasing inflammation parameters and subtotal lung field shadowing in the lateral chest radiograph proved the diagnosis of an aspiration pneumonia. The endoscopic investigation of the oropharynx confirmed the suspicion of palatoschisis in the form of an uvula bifida and a submucous cleft palate (Fig. 1). After suitable presurgical preparation, the surgical procedure was performed with the foal in back position under general anesthesia. Because of the limited overview of the transoral approach performed, endoscopic optics were introduced to provide a view control on a screen during the proceedings. Thus, by the far less traumatic, endoscopically assisted transoral approach, the problem of exposure of the operative field was managed easily. Analogous to the setup of cleft palate repair in humans, we performed an intravelar myoplasty of the levator veli palatini muscle in the foal according to Kriens.5 Until now, this procedure has not been applied explicitly to horses, probably because when the function of the levator palatini muscle in horses is discussed, there is controversy regarding the active raising of the extremely long soft palate.3 However, a layer-wise closure of the cleft palate should decrease sore healing disturbances with dehiscences and raise the static stability of the palate. After closure of the oral layer with 2-0 and 3-0 resorptive sutures (Fig. 2), the foal recovered well from anesthesia. After postsurgical treatment, the foal was returned to the mother and was able to drink normally. After antibiotic therapy with gentamicin and Veracin, at 8 days postoperatively, the lateral chest radiograph proved clearly falling findings. The inspection of the situs showed at that time a “first-in, first-out” sore healing. The foal developed normally up to the last control, 12 months postoperatively. Nevertheless, the precise value of this surgical technique must be evaluated based on the results in other cases.Fig. 1.: Endoscopic view of the submucous cleft palate. 1, Submucous cleft palate with visible vomer; 2, lateral border of the cleft with a belly-like concavity falsely inserting into the levator veli palatini muscle.Fig. 2.: Closure of the oral layer at the end of the operation.Heico-Rüdiger Krause, Ph.D. Jan Rustemeyer, M.D. Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer-und Gesichtschirurgie Plastische Operationen Spezielle Schmerztherapie Klinikum Bremen-Mitte Bremen, Germany Marc Koene, D.V.M. Tierärztliche Klinik für Pferde Lüsche, Germany DISCLOSURE The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicCleft Lip and Palate ResearchFrench-language works237,207