MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967783411 · doi:10.1080/10425170412331279620

Isolation, Tissue Distribution and Prokaryotic Expression of a Novel Human X-linked Gene <i>LHFPL1</i>

2004· article· en· W1967783411 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chaoqun Huang, Jinhu Guo, Shen Liu, Yuxi Shan, Shiliang Wu, Yongping Cai, Long Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA sequence · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsFudan University
KeywordsBiologyComplementary DNAGeneSignal peptidecDNA libraryMolecular biologyEndoplasmic reticulumCloning (programming)Transmembrane proteinGene expressionGeneticsPeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report here the cloning and characterization of a novel human lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 1 (LHFPL1) gene, isolated from human brain cDNA library, and mapped to Xq23 by browsing the UCSC genomic database. LHFPL1 contains an ORF with length of 660bp, encoding a protein with a signal peptide sequence and three transmembrane regions, and its predicted molecular weight is 23.7kDa which coincides with the result of prokaryotic expression. LHFPL1 protein is postulated to be localized at endoplasmic reticulum. RT-PCR amplification in seventen human tissues revealed that LHFPL1 is expressed widely in all tissues, especially highly in lung, thymus, skeleton muscle, colon and ovary. In addition, it was demonstrated that LHFPL1 is also transcribed in six liver tumor cell lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA sequenceSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207