ABSORBED DOSE TO THE ADULT MALE AND FEMALE BRAIN FROM 18F-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The absorbed doses to adult male and female brains from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose were investigated. A total of eight male and six female patients undergoing clinical positron tomography brain scans were included in this study. This patient population allowed for a comparison of the absorbed dose to the brain in men and women. For each patient, time-activity curves for the brain were generated, yielding cumulated activity measurements for the entire organ. From these cumulated activities the average residence times for both male and female subjects were calculated and then multiplied by the S-values from the MIRDOSE 3.1 software program for absorbed dose estimates. The average absorbed dose per administered activity to the adult male brain was found to be 4.2 x 10(-2) mGy MBq(-1), which is lower than that found for the adult female brain of 5.3 x 10(-2) mGy MBq(-1). Six of the male and all six female subjects were each studied on two separate occasions, allowing for an analysis of within-subject variability. The average variation in the self-dose for all 12 patients was found to be within 14%, suggesting that in most cases this method of obtaining a single dose estimate is precise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".