Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare life habits between individuals with adult and mild phenotypes of myotonic dystrophy; identify life habit dimensions in which accomplishment is compromised; and describe satisfaction related to life habits. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: A random sample of 200 subjects with myotonic dystrophy (42 mild phenotypes, 158 adult phenotypes). MEASUREMENT: The Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H), a questionnaire assessing self-perceived life habits (activities and participation as described in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)). RESULTS: Participants with the adult phenotype demonstrated significantly lower participation levels than those with the mild phenotype on 8 out of the 11 categories of the LIFE-H. Lower levels of accomplishment were reported in Mobility, Housing, Fitness, Nutrition, Personal Care, Employment, Recreation, and Community Life categories among the adult phenotype. The Recreation category was the most affected, with 4 out of 7 items revealing compromised accomplishment among 22-27% of individuals. The lowest satisfaction score was observed in the Employment and Recreation categories. In all categories, individuals with the adult phenotype displayed significantly lower satisfaction levels than those with the mild phenotype. CONCLUSION: This study helped to establish a clearer distinction between activities and participation levels of individuals with the mild phenotype and those with the adult phenotype and supported tailored rehabilitation and community services to improve accomplishment of life habits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".