MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rapid determination of COL2A1 mutations in individuals with Stickler syndrome: Analysis of potential premature termination codons

2000· article· en· W1967857104 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas J. Wilkin, Ruth M. Liberfarb, Joie Davis, Howard P. Levy, William G. Cole, Clair A. Francomano, Daniel H. Cohn

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsBiologygenomic DNAGeneMutationRestriction enzymeStop codonMolecular biologyPolymerase chain reactionPoint mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stickler syndrome is one of the milder phenotypes resulting from mutations in the gene that encodes type-II collagen, COL2A1. All COL2A1 mutations known to cause Stickler syndrome result in the formation of a premature termination codon within the type-II collagen gene. COL2A1 has 10 in-frame CGA codons, which can mutate to TGA STOP codons via a methylation-deamination mechanism. We have analyzed these sites in genomic DNA from a panel of 40 Stickler syndrome patients to test the hypothesis that mutations that cause Stickler syndrome preferentially occur at these bases. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of genomic DNA containing each of the in-frame CGA codons was done by one of two methods: either using primers that amplify DNA that includes the CGA codon, or using allele-specific primers that either amplify normal sequence containing a CGA codon or amplify a mutant sequence containing a TGA codon. Analysis of PCR products by restriction endonuclease digestion or sequencing demonstrated the presence of a normal or mutated codon. TGA mutations were identified in eight patients, at five of the 10 in-frame CGA codons. The identification of these mutations in eight of 40 patients demonstrates that these sites are common sites for mutations in individuals with Stickler syndrome and, we propose, should be analyzed as a first step in the search for mutations that result in this disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical GeneticsSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207