MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1967900842 · doi:10.4161/psb.5.9.12676

Calmodulin binding to Arabidopsis cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels

2010· article· en· W1967900842 on OpenAlexaff
Huda Abdel-Hamid, Kimberley Chin, Dea Shahinas, Wolfgang Moeder, Keiko Yoshioka

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Signaling & Behavior · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArabidopsisCalmodulinIon channelCyclic nucleotide-binding domainCysteineNucleotideIn silicoBinding siteChemistryBiologyMutationBiophysicsBiochemistryGeneticsCell biologyMutantGeneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently we have reported that the αC-helix in the cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD) is required for channel regulation and function of cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels (CNGCs) in Arabidopsis. A mutation at arginine 557 to cysteine (R557C) in the αC-helix of the CNBD caused an alteration in channel regulation. Protein sequence alignments revealed that R557 is located in a region that is important for calmodulin (CaM) binding. It has been hypothesized that CaM negatively regulates plant CNGCs similar to their counter parts in animals. However, only a handful of studies has been published so far and we still do not have much information about the regulation of CNGCs by CaM. Here, we conducted in silico binding prediction of CaM and Arabidopsis CNGC12 (AtCNGC12) to further study the role of R557. Our analysis revealed that R557 forms salt bridges with both D79 and E83 in AtCaM1. Interestingly, a mutation of R557 to C causes the loss of these salt bridges. Our data further suggests that this alteration in CaM binding causes the observed altered channel regulation and that R557 plays an important role in CaM binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Signaling & BehaviorSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207