Structure, Flexibility, and Repair of Two Different Orientations of the Same Alkyl Interstrand DNA Cross-Link
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interstrand DNA cross-links are the principal cytotoxic lesions produced by chemotherapeutic bifunctional alkylating agents. Using an N(4)C-ethyl-N(4)C interstrand DNA cross-link to mimic this class of clinically important cancer chemotherapeutic agents, we have characterized the repair, structure, and flexibility of DNA that contains this cross-link in two different orientations. Plasmid DNAs in which the cytosines of single CpG or GpC steps are covalently linked were efficiently processed by repair proficient and homologous recombination deficient strains of Escherichia coli. Repair in a nucleotide excision repair (NER) deficient strain was less efficient overall and displayed a 4-fold difference between the two cross-link orientations. Both the structure and flexibility of DNA containing these cross-links were examined using a combination of (1)H NMR, restrained molecular dynamics simulations, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The NMR structure of a decamer containing a CpG interstrand cross-link shows the cross-link easily accommodated within the duplex with no disruption of hydrogen bonding and only minor perturbations of helical parameters. In contrast, disruptions caused by the GpC cross-link produced considerable conformational flexibility that precluded structure determination by NMR. AFM imaging of cross-link-containing plasmid DNA showed that the increased flexibility observed in the GpC cross-link persists when it is embedded into much larger DNA fragments. These differences may account for the different repair efficiencies seen in NER deficient cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".