Review: 3 of 4 RCTs on the treatment of adolescent depression in primary care have positive results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stein RE, Zitner LE, Jensen PS. Interventions for adolescent depression in primary care. Pediatrics 2006;118:669–82. [OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2] Q In adolescents in primary care settings, is treatment of depression (ie, psychosocial, educational, and/or supportive interventions) effective? Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care ★★★★★★☆ Paediatrics ★★★★★★☆ Psychiatry ★★★★★★☆ ### ![Graphic][3]</img>Data sources: Medline, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane library (1999 to June 2005); reference lists; and experts in the field. ### ![Graphic][4]</img>Study selection and assessment: English language studies that investigated treatment or psychosocial support for depression. Articles on case studies, evaluations of a particular measure or tool, purely psychopharmacological treatments, adult specialty care treatment, or long term treatment for children and adolescents were excluded. Before and after studies were included in the review but are not summarised in this abstract. Studies contributing indirect evidence (ie, on depression management in adults in primary care or on other childhood mental health conditions in primary care) were also included in the review; this abstract focuses on the direct evidence pertaining to the research question. 4 … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DPediatrics%26rft.stitle%253DPediatrics%26rft.issn%253D0031-4005%26rft.aulast%253DStein%26rft.auinit1%253DR.%2BE.K.%26rft.volume%253D118%26rft.issue%253D2%26rft.spage%253D669%26rft.epage%253D682%26rft.atitle%253DInterventions%2Bfor%2BAdolescent%2BDepression%2Bin%2BPrimary%2BCare%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1542%252Fpeds.2005-2086%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F16882822%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=pediatrics&resid=118/2/669&atom=%2Febmed%2F12%2F1%2F27.atom [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [4]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Editorial About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | medium |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".