MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968039693 · doi:10.1002/elan.201200245

Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube‐CaCO<sub>3</sub> Nanoparticle Composites for the Construction of a Tyrosinase‐Based Amperometric Dopamine Biosensor

2012· article· en· W1968039693 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Magdalena‐Rodica Bujduveanu, Wenjuan Yao, Alan Le Goff, Karine Gorgy, Dan Shan, Guowang Diao, Eleonora‐Mihaela Ungureanu, Serge Cosnier

Bibliographic record

VenueElectroanalysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsBiosensorCatecholAscorbic acidTyrosinaseAmperometryMaterials scienceDetection limitNanoparticleNanomaterialsCarbon nanotubeNanotubeNanotechnologyElectrodeElectrochemistryChemical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistryChromatographyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the fabrication of a highly sensitive dopamine biosensor based on the entrapment of tyrosinase into CaCO 3 nanoparticles at Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube (MWCNT) electrodes. CaCO 3 acts as host matrix for tyrosinase and MWCNT provides a highly porous conductive network enhancing the enzyme immobilization and the electrochemical transduction of the enzyme reaction by boosting the amplification phenomenon involved in the biosensing of catechol and dopamine. The comparison of the performance of CaCO 3 ‐tyrosinase electrodes with and without MWCNT film clearly indicates the improvement in sensitivity and maximum current brought by the combination of MWCNTs and inorganic nanomaterials. These nanostructured hybrid bioelectrodes exhibit a high sensitivity for the detection of catechol and dopamine, namely 35.7 A mol −1 L cm −2 , the detection limit for dopamine being 15 nmol L −1 with no influence of the presence of interferents, i.e. uric acid and ascorbic acid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectroanalysisSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207