Release of nitric oxide in the central nervous system mediates tonic and phasic contraction of the cat lower oesophageal sphincter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) in the brainstem is implicated in the control of swallowing and oesophageal peristalsis. This study examines the role of brainstem NO in the maintenance of lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone, relaxation and contraction. In urethane-anaesthetized cats, oesophageal peristalsis and sphincter pressures were continuously monitored. Drugs were administered into the fourth ventricle. Oesophageal peristalsis and sphincter relaxation and contraction were induced by superior laryngeal nerve stimulation or intra-oesophageal balloon distention. Basal sphincter pressure was significantly reduced after the i.c.v. administration of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, l-Ng-monomethyl arginine. The inhibitor's d-isomer had no significant effect on basal sphincter pressure, while l-arginine partially reversed the effect. The NOS inhibitor had no effect on sphincter relaxation, whereas the contraction of the sphincter following relaxation was significantly inhibited. Central nitric oxide synthase inhibition reduces basal LOS tone and contraction amplitude but has no effect on swallow or balloon distention induced sphincter relaxation. Therefore, central release of NO acts in the pathway to stimulate dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus neurones projecting to excitatory neurones in the sphincter. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase in the CNS does not prevent relaxation of the LOS, suggesting that other pathways that do not utilize NO are important in the induction of LOS relaxation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".