MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF GENETIC POPULATION STRUCTURE IN THE NOISY MINER USING DNA MICROSATELLITE MARKERS

2002· article· en· W1968066772 on OpenAlexaff
Cathryn L. Abbott, Tarmo Põldmaa, Stephen C. Lougheed, Michael F. Clarke, Peter T. Boag

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnithological Applications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrosatelliteBiologyPopulationBiological dispersalIsolation by distanceGenetic diversityGenetic structureEvolutionary biologyHumanitiesGeneticsDemographyGeneSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Noisy Miner (Manorina melanocephala) is a common, cooperatively breeding meliphagid of eastern and southeastern Australia. We used DNA microsatellites to examine the apportionment of genetic diversity in Noisy Miners at disparate geographic scales to generate baseline information about the population genetic structure of this species. We examined five loci for 79 individuals from four populations. We found small amounts of genetic differentiation between paired populations separated by 30–40 km, and more substantial and significant differentiation between populations separated by more than 1000 km. This result implies substantial gene flow on local scales but much less at regional levels, probably reflecting short dispersal distances and isolation by distance. Análisis Jerárquico de la Estructura Genética Poblacional de Manorina melanocephala Utilizando Marcadores de ADN Microsatelital Resumen. Manorina melanocephala es un melifágido común del sur-este de Australia que presenta cría cooperativa. Utilizamos ADN microsatelital para examinar la distribución de la diversidad genética de M. melanocephala a diferentes escalas geográficas para generar información básica sobre la estructura genética poblacional de esta especie. Examinamos 5 loci en 79 individuos pertenecientes a cuatro poblaciones. Encontramos una baja diferenciación genética entre pares de poblaciones separadas por 30–40 km, y una diferenciación más substancial y significativa entre poblaciones separadas por más de 1000 km. Estos resultados sugieren un alto grado de flujo génico a escala local, el cual es mucho menor a nivel regional, lo que probablemente refleja distancias de dispersión cortas y aislamiento por distancia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnithological ApplicationsSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207