Apoptosis in Adriamycin Cardiomyopathy and Its Modulation by Probucol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dose-dependent cardiomyopathy and heart failure due to adriamycin have been shown to be due to increased oxidative stress and loss of myocytes. We examined the incidence of myocardial apoptosis as well as changes in the expression of apoptotic regulatory gene products in an established animal model of adriamycin cardiomyopathy. Rats were treated with adriamycin (cumulative dose, 15 mg/kg), and the hearts were examined for apoptosis as well as expression of Bax, caspase 3, and Bcl-2 at 0, 4, 10, 16, and 21 days after the treatment. A significant increase in the incidence of apoptosis was seen at 4 days, followed by a decline at 10 and 16 days of posttreatment. At 21 days, the number of apoptotic cells increased again and included cells of the conducting system. Expression of Bax corresponded to these biphasic changes, whereas the converse was true for the expression of Bcl-2. The latter peaked at 10 days followed by a decline at 16 and 21 days. The Bax/Bcl-2 ratio also correlated with the incidence of apoptosis. Expression of caspase 3 correlated with increased apoptosis, but only at early time points. Probucol (cumulative dose, 120 mg/kg), a known antioxidant as well as promoter of endogenous antioxidants, significantly reduced the incidence of apoptosis as well as expression of Bax. Adriamycin-induced hemodynamic changes were also prevented by probucol. These data suggest that adriamycin-induced apoptosis is mediated by oxidative stress and may play a role in the development of heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".