MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968108553 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.092005

First data from DM-Ice17

2014· article· en· W1968108553 on OpenAlexafffund
J. J. Cherwinka, D. Grant, F. Halzen, K. M. Heeger, L. Hsu, A. Hubbard, A. Karle, M. Kauer, V. A. Kudryavtsev, C. M. Macdonald, R. H. Maruyama, S.M. Paling, W. Pettus, Zachary Pierpoint, Bethany Reilly, M. Robinson, P. Sandstrom, N. J. C. Spooner, S. Telfer, L. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersLaboratori Nazionali del Gran SassoWisconsin Alumni Research FoundationNational Science FoundationYale UniversityFermilabU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Nuclear Security Administration
KeywordsDetectorSouthern HemisphereSoftware deploymentGlacial periodDark matterPhysicsWestern hemisphereRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceGeologyAstronomyGeographyOpticsComputer scienceGeomorphologyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the first analysis of background data from DM-Ice17, a direct-detection dark matter experiment consisting of 17 kg of NaI(Tl) target material. It was codeployed with IceCube 2457 m deep in the South Pole glacial ice in December 2010 and is the first such detector operating in the Southern Hemisphere. The background rate in the $6.5--8.0\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{keV}}_{\mathrm{ee}}$ region is measured to be $7.9\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.4\text{ }\text{ }\text{counts}/\text{day}/\mathrm{keV}/\mathrm{kg}$. This is consistent with the expected background from the detector assemblies with negligible contributions from the surrounding ice. The successful deployment and operation of DM-Ice17 establishes the South Pole ice as a viable location for future underground, low-background experiments in the Southern Hemisphere. The detector assembly and deployment are described here, as well as the analysis of the DM-Ice17 backgrounds based on data from the first two years of operation after commissioning, July 2011--June 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207