MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968142562 · doi:10.1021/jp002647b

Comment on “Experimental Determination of the Dependence of OH Radical Yield on Photon Energy:  A Comparison with Theoretical Simulations” by Fulford et al. (<i>J. Phys. Chem. A</i> 1999, <i>103</i>, 11345−11349)

2001· article· en· W1968142562 on OpenAlexafffund
Jintana Meesungnoen, Abdelali Filali-Mouhim, Samlee Mankhetkorn, Jean‐Paul Jay‐Gerin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsYield (engineering)ChemistryPhotonEnergy (signal processing)Computational chemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommentComment on "Experimental Determination of the Dependence of OH Radical Yield on Photon Energy: A Comparison with Theoretical Simulations" by Fulford et al. (J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 11345−11349)Jintana Meesungnoen, Abdelali Filali-Mouhim, Samlee Mankhetkorn, and Jean-Paul Jay-GerinView Author Information Département de Médecine Nucléaire et de Radiobiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada, and Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Bangsaen, Chonburi 20131, Thailand. Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 10, 2125–2126Publication Date (Web):February 8, 2001Publication History Received26 July 2000Revised15 December 2000Published online8 February 2001Published inissue 1 March 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp002647bhttps://doi.org/10.1021/jp002647barticle-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views267Altmetric-Citations4LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (32 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Chemical reactions,Dissociation,Electrical energy,Energy,Water Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0240.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207