MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968163033 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2014.6866612

Enhancing mobile video streaming by lookahead rate allocation in wireless networks

2014· article· en· W1968163033 on OpenAlexaff
Hatem Abou-Zeid, Hossam S. Hassanein, Nizar Zorba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Base stationVideo streamingComputer networkCellular networkWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)WirelessTransmission (telecommunications)Degradation (telecommunications)Real-time computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing novel video delivery mechanisms have become imperative to cope with the unprecedented growth in mobile video traffic. In this paper, we present video transmission schemes that improve the streaming experience by looking ahead at the future rates users are expected to face. Such an approach is useful for the delivery of stored videos that can be strategically buffered in advance at the users' devices. For instance, if it is known a user is entering a low coverage area, content can be prebuffered to support smooth streaming. Therefore, the Base Stations (BSs) can now plan long-term multi-user rate allocations based not only on current channel states, but also on future conditions. To provide a performance benchmark we first develop a lookahead multi-objective Linear Program (LP) that offers a trade-off between minimizing overall network video degradation, and providing fairness in individual user degradation. Then, to efficiently solve the problem, we present a polynomial-time algorithm that closely follows the pareto-optimal trade-off of the multi-objective LP. We provide an extensive performance analysis of the proposed methods by simulations, and numerical results demonstrate that significant improvements in video streaming are achievable by the lookahead rate allocation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207