MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the thyroid – a rare tumour at an unusual site

2004· article· en· W1968205368 on OpenAlexaff
Mustafa Abbas, TAREQ AJRAWI, M.F. Tungekar

Bibliographic record

VenueApmis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyDifferential diagnosisThyroidChondrosarcomaCD99CD117Mesenchymal chondrosarcomaMesenchymal stem cellImmunohistochemistryMedicineLesionStromaHemangiopericytomaSolitary fibrous tumorBiologyCD34Internal medicineStem cellVimentin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the light microscopic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of the first case in the literature of a primary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) of the thyroid and discuss its differential diagnosis at unusual extraskeletal sites. A nodular lesion of the thyroid with no evidence of extrathyroid disease showed the bimorphic pattern and haemangiopericytoma-like areas typical of MC. In the undifferentiated areas, the cells were CD99 positive/CD117 negative, while the stroma showed focal positivity for alpha-inhibin. In spite of its rarity, it is important to diagnose primary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in a parenchymatous organ such as the thyroid because its biological behaviour may be different from that of tumours of similar morphology and complete resection is the treatment of choice. The patient is free of disease nearly 66 months after its first presentation. Cytogenetic and immunohistological markers may play important roles in diagnosis of this lesion in future, especially with limited tissue samplings; however, for the present a thorough sampling of the tumour remains the best diagnostic strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApmisSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207