MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968214705 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30215

Self-Sustained Oscillations of High Speed Impinging Planar Jets

2010· article· en· W1968214705 on OpenAlexaff
David Arthurs, Samir Ziada

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrouhal numberMechanicsJet (fluid)PlanarDimensionless quantityRotational symmetryPhysicsAcousticsTransonicFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceOpticsAerodynamicsReynolds numberTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High speed impinging jets are frequently used in a variety of industrial applications including thermal and coating control processes. These flows are liable to the production of very intense narrow band acoustic tones, which are produced by a feedback mechanism between instabilities in the jet free shear layer which roll up to form large scale coherent structures, and pressure fluctuations produced by the impingement of these structures at the impingement surface. This paper examines tone generation of a high speed planar gas jet impinging normally on a flat, rigid surface. Experiments are performed over the complete range of subsonic and transonic jet flow velocities for which tones are generated, from U0 = 150m/s (M≈0.4) to choked flow (U0 = 343m/s, M = 1), and over the complete range of impingement distance for which tones occur. The effect of varying the jet thickness is also examined. The behavior of the planar impinging jet case is compared to that of the axisymmetric case, and found to be significantly different, with tones being excited at larger impingement distances, and at lower flow velocities. The Strouhal numbers associated with tone generation in the planar case are on average an order of magnitude lower than that of the axisymmetric case when using similar velocity and length scales. The frequency behavior of the resulting tones is predicted using a simple feedback model, which allows the identification of the various shear layer modes of the instabilities driving tone generation. Finally, a thorough dimensionless analysis is performed in order to quantify the system behavior in terms of the appropriate scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer MechanismsFrench-language works237,207