MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968228104 · doi:10.1364/josab.22.000943

Measurements of temperature scaling laws in an optically dense magneto-optical trap

2005· article· en· W1968228104 on OpenAlexaff
A. Vorozcovs, M. Weel, Scott Beattie, S. Cauchi, A. Kumarakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrap (plumbing)Magneto-optical trapScalingScaling lawMagneto opticalPhysicsMaterials scienceLawCondensed matter physicsOpticsMagnetic fieldPolitical scienceMathematicsMeteorologyQuantum mechanicsGeometryLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the temperature scaling laws for the conditions under which a cloud of trapped ^85Rb atoms in the sigma+/sigma- configuration makes the transition from the temperature-limited regime to the multiple-scattering regime. Our experimental technique for measuring temperature relies on measuring the ballistic expansion of the cloud after turning off the confining forces and imaging the cloud size as a function of time with two CCD cameras. In the transition regime, the temperature T is shown to depend on the number of atoms N and the peak density n as (T-T_0) proportional N^1/3 and as (T-T_0) proportional n^2/3, in a manner consistent with theoretical predictions. Here T_0 is defined as the equilibrium temperature of a low-density optical molasses. In the multiple-scattering regime we find that T proportional Omega^2/(delta Gamma), where Omega and delta are the Rabi frequency and the detuning of the trapping laser, respectively, and Gamma is the natural linewidth of the cycling transition. We have also measured the ratio of temperatures along the axial and radial directions of the magnetic field gradient coils and find that the temperature is isotropic only if the intensities of the three orthogonal trapping beams are equal, and that the ratio is generally independent of trapping laser intensity and magnetic field gradient. Finally we demonstrate a measurement of the gravitational acceleration precise to approximately 0.1% by tracking the center of the cloud during ballistic expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207