Multiple Gastric Stromal Tumors in a Child without Syndromic Association Lacks Common KIT or PDGFRα Mutations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A diagnosis of multiple gastric stromal tumors that were nonmetastatic at presentation was made in an 11-year-old girl who presented with hematemesis. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare diagnosis in childhood and reported multiple lesions are generally seen in the context of familial disease, occasionally with syndromic associations. Although there are no reports of genetic mutation in cases of pediatric GIST, very many cases of multiple GISTs investigated on a molecular level have shown germline KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha mutation; these were familial cases. Despite the negative family history in our patient, the multiplicity of lesions in such a young patient raised concern for a genetic predisposition and prompted extensive molecular workup. Repeat evaluation of distinct aliquots of tumor tissue by polymerase chain amplification followed by sequence analysis of selected coding sequences of KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha previously shown to harbor mutations in GIST, yielded no evidence of even a somatic mutation. This clinically unique case is discussed in the context of a literature review.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".