MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968245628 · doi:10.1139/e00-020

Potential-field signatures of buried Precambrian basement in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

2000· article· en· W1968245628 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mark Pilkington, W Miles, Gerald M. Ross, W. R. Roest

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPrecambrianBasementRock magnetismSedimentary rockIgneous rockLithologyMagnetic susceptibilityMagnetic anomalyGeochemistryGeophysicsMagnetizationRemanenceMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An internally consistent, levelled compilation of magnetic data is derived for Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. With Bouguer gravity data, this compilation is used to refine the definition of Precambrian basement domains within the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Magnetic data are draped at a constant distance above the mapped basement surface to reduce the effects of varying magnetic source depths. Automated interpretation methods that effectively map outlines of magnetic sources are used to characterize the internal structure of the domains and to aid in their delineation. The basement domain map thus derived differs from previous interpretations in the extension of domains further to the southwest, due mainly to the availability of new public-domain magnetic data and the more precise definition of domain boundaries, based on the magnetic source location maps. The Nahanni, Hottah, Chinchaga, Thorsby, Vulcan, and Kiskatinaw domains are weakly magnetic and characterized by magnetic sources that are paramagnetic, comprising low-susceptibility silicate minerals. All other domains are characterized by the presence of ferrimagnetic material, most likely magnetite, which has a sufficiently high susceptibility to produce measurable anomalies. The largest anomalies and magnetizations are found in the Fort Nelson, Fort Simpson, Buffalo Head, Talston, Ksituan, and Matzhiwin domains. Such large magnetizations are usually indicative of intermediate igneous rocks associated with magmatic arc environments. Moderate-amplitude anomalies and (or) magnetizations are characteristic of the Nova, Wabamun, Lacombe, Rimbey, Loverna, and Medicine Hat domains, suggesting the presence of ferrimagnetic basic and granitoid rocks. Within some of the moderately magnetic domains are areas of paramagnetic lithologies that produce no magnetic anomalies. The narrower regions of magnetic lows, such as the Thorsby, Kiskatinaw, and Vulcan domains, are interpreted as resulting from demagnetization effects accompanying collision. Since demagnetization zones are limited in areal extent, the wider, more extensive magnetic lows of the Chinchaga and Hottah domains likely result from a combination of boundary demagnetization and a lower bulk magnetization level of crustal lithologies present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207