Inward Remodeling of the Rabbit Aorta Is Blocked by the Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor Doxycycline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constrictive arterial remodeling accounts for a significant proportion of lumen loss in atherosclerotic progression and postangioplasty stenosis. Recent research suggests that constrictive remodeling is mediated by turnover of the extracellular matrix. We hypothesized that remodeling could be attenuated by treatment with the safe, effective matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor doxycycline. Female rabbit abdominal aortas were denuded using a 4-Fr balloon embolectomy catheter, and reinjured 3 weeks later. Treatment with 30 mg/kg/day doxycycline was begun the day before the second injury. At 6 weeks after injury, lumen area measured 13.1 +/- 1.2 mm(2) in controls compared to 17.5 +/- 1.6 mm(2) in doxycycline-treated rabbits (p = 0.05). At 4 days after injury, MMP-2 activity was increased compared to uninjured controls, but doxycycline treatment reduced MMP-2 activity. Doxycycline treatment also inhibited fibrillar collagen deposition in the intima by 87% as detected by polarized light microscopy. Doxycycline was an effective inhibitor of constrictive arterial remodeling in the rabbit aorta. Treatment reduced MMP activity and attenuated the deposition of extracellular matrix particularly in the intima.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".